If you care even nominally about racial equality and equal educational opportunities for every student, please read this with open eyes.
We cannot allow cities in Georgia to create their own independent school districts.
Before I make my case, I will say two things: First, I don’t think people advocating this course of action are necessarily overt racists, and second, I can understand the appeal of local control. I really can.
Most people will agree that those actually living in a community will understand the issues facing that community and will be able to make the best decisions regarding the schools for a particular community. This article by DeKalb County School System board member Stan Jester articulates many of the benefits of a locally controlled, independent school system.
However, this is not the only consideration when discussing Independent School Districts (also referred to as City School Districts). I hope that as people spend a little more time thinking about the deeper implications and effects of this, they will perhaps choose differently.
Okay, so here I go.
In Georgia, there are 181 public school systems. There are 159 county school systems (i.e. Gwinnett County Public Schools, Fulton County Public Schools, DeKalb County School System) and 21 city school systems (i.e. Atlanta Public Schools and Decatur City Schools). Currently, in Art. VIII, Sec. V, Par. VI, of the 1976 Georgia Constitution (Code Ann. § 2-5306), “[a]uthority is hereby granted to municipal corporations to maintain existing independent school systems… No independent school system shall hereafter be established.”
Basically, if you were a city school district (or Independent School District) before 1945, Georgia law allows you to continue operating – which is why Decatur City Schools and other city districts are still in operation. However, if a city wants to create a city school district now, they are prohibited.
Representative Tom Taylor of Dunwoody, one of the wealthiest suburbs in metro Atlanta, wants to have the Georgia Constitution amended to allow cities created since 2005 (eg. Johns Creek, Sandy Springs, Dunwoody, Brookhaven, Peachtree Corners, etc.) to create their own school districts (HB 784). He tried to get this bill through the legislature during the 2013-2014 legislative session. It failed. This past 2014-2015 legislative session saw the bill fail again, but this time it included any city, not just ones created since 2005 (HB 4).
If you are zoning out by now, let me bring you back. To me, this is a civil rights issue. Most of these cities are predominantly wealthy and white.
Desegregation laws in the 1960s caused massive white flight from the city of Atlanta in large part because white parents wanted to avoid having white children in school with black children (either because their children would be zoned for schools where black children would be attending or black children would be allowed into certain majority white schools through the process of intradistrict busing).
If you find this hard to believe, consider the story of the integration of Kirkwood Elementary School. Read the story in Atlanta Rising, The Atlanta Paradox, or any other book that chronicles how Kirkwood Elementary announced on a Friday in 1965 that they would be integrating their students the following Monday. Over the weekend, all but 7 white children left the school and almost 500 black students started school the next Monday. The school was officially “integrated.” (See an online version of the excerpt from The Atlanta Paradox here.)
In order to avoid these situations during the 1960s and 70s, whites moved outside of the Atlanta city school district and into DeKalb County, where there weren’t as many black families. But as more middle class and working blacks were able to afford to move out of the city of Atlanta and into a better school district, whites began leaving DeKalb and heading for Gwinnett and North Fulton. One individual who attended a mostly white high school during those years told me privately a few months ago that blacks had “ruined their school” when they had arrived at her high school in the 1980s.
DeKalb County, along with 109 other school systems in Georgia (including Atlanta Public Schools and Fulton County), needed additional government oversight during the 1960s and 70s to ensure that desegregation was, in fact, happening.
Once a school system demonstrated that it was desegregated in six categories (called Green Factors) and unlikely to return to segregation, they were placed on “Unitary Status” and the system was then free from federal oversight for the indefinite future. (DeKalb, Clayton, APS, and Fulton have all attained Unitary Status.) For a really long document from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights explaining this in further detail click here.
And that brings us to the cityhood movement of today — and their quest for city school districts.
Apparently white flight has reached a limit as to how far they are willing to “fly” to escape integrated schools. Nowadays, people don’t state directly that they don’t want their children in schools with children of other races – they make the case against having their children in school with children from poor families or troubled backgrounds, many of whom happen to be Hispanic or black. While de jure (or legal) segregation does not exist, de facto (what’s actually happening) segregation is, sadly, very much alive.
This is why independent school districts are problematic: allowing cities to create their own school districts in Georgia would only exacerbate the problem of de facto segregation. The only kinds of cities that could even support their own school systems financially would have to be ones that had a wealthy tax base, and this would result in a myriad of problems, including segregation of socioeconomic classes and (many times) race.
Consider the cities that have been created since 2005 – Dunwoody (69.8% white, 12% black, median family income of $106,777), Johns Creek (63.5% white, 9% black, median family income of $137,271), Sandy Springs (65% white, 20% black, median family income of $129,810), and Brookhaven (61% white, 17% black, median family income of $52,679). In addition to being majority white cities, they are also extremely wealthy compared with other parts of Atlanta.
Creating an independent school district would not only allow these cities the ability to cut off families who could not afford to live in their city limits, but it would also remove a significant amount of funding from the county systems that they are currently a part of.
By simply incorporating, cities (contrary to popular opinion) did not remove any funding from the county school system. In creating an independent school district, however, these cities would take the property taxes allocated to the county school system and instead use it to fund their city school system, leaving the schools left in the county system without their biggest tax base.
These school systems already have a difficult time spreading their thin budget to meet the needs of the county-wide system, so removing their wealthiest taxpayers would further limit their ability to attract teachers and administrators with competitive salaries, maintain school buildings and properties, and provide materials for extracurricular activities (i.e. sports fields/stadiums, band equipment, art supplies, etc.) – among other things.
If any of this resonates with you, please take the time to figure out how you can advocate against independent (city) school districts and other isolationist policies. I’m not trying to make anyone feel guilty for unintentionally playing a role in these types of things. (Heck, I grew up in the Atlanta suburb of Gwinnett and went to a predominantly white high school with only a handful of black students in the entire school.) But I am trying to raise awareness so that people can understand that their actions don’t occur in a vacuum and that we must consider how our individual actions impact others.
A few ways you can personally get involved:
1. Join a Local School Advisory Council (LSAC) at one of the local schools (elementary, middle, or high) you are zoned for. Visit your district webpage for more information.
2. Join or begin a Parent Council in your particular region or cluster. (An example for Fulton County is available here, and a list of Parent Councils in DeKalb County are listed here.)
3. Attend Community Input Meetings at your local school board meetings. Here you can speak before the entire board of education and interested members of the community. Check on your district website for more information about when these occur.
4. Reach out to your state representative or state senator or local school board member and personally explain your concerns. They are elected to represent their constituents, so why not let them know what you think. Click here to find your state legislators.
If nothing else, hopefully you will begin having this conversation with those you know. Kids and their life outcomes are greatly affected by education, and every student deserves a chance to succeed. Let’s try to figure out the best way to do that.
July 12, 2015 at 12:31 am
A good read with many observations that were unknown to me before. It does seem like the formation of an independent school district should not be allowed. I come to this conviction based on the idea that we all live in communities with diversities ranging from ethnicity to socioeconomic and everything in-between. The very idea that we are communities necessitate we see individual uniqueness as a part of the whole and has the greatest chance of enriching our personal lives and the lives of others. It’s in a community that we have the greatest chance of being our best and increasing our capacity to influence change within our communities. To push away others or remove ourselves from the larger whole does not make us better. All it does is show that we see ourselves as better, when in reality we are actually making ourselves smaller. Making ourselves smaller does not help us to become better!
My goal in life is to enlarge my capacity to become caring, loving, kind, generous, accepting, encouraging and concern myself with the needs of others. I have found that helping others and being involved with others actually facilitates my capacity to achieve the above goals. It’s being engaged with others, regardless of their ethnicity, color, socioeconomic background, etc that gets me closer to my goals.
LikeLike
September 20, 2015 at 11:07 pm
Dunwoody High School is 46% white. McNair High School is 98% black. Dunwoody High School has a feeder pattern. I don’t see how forming a city school district would change the demographics.
Money isn’t the answer. Many school districts around the state that spend much less per student than Dekalb get much better results on their CCRPI scores than Dekalb. If money were the answer then APS would be one of the best schools in the country. It’s about how you spend the money you have.
School budgets are thin because teachers get the short end of the stick in the budget.
Just some thoughts.
LikeLike
September 22, 2015 at 2:14 pm
Thank you for your comments, DeKalb Inside Out. I do realize that Dunwoody HS is not majority white, however, the city of Dunwoody is (and it is definitely one of the wealthiest cities in Georgia). If the state constitution were to be amended, anyone not living in Dunwoody city limits would not have free public education from the city school. Currently, there are residents of Doraville who are zoned for Dunwoody HS (including the neighborhood of the Mayor of Doraville). This would alter the demographics of Dunwoody HS because it would alter the feeder pattern by excluding neighborhoods not within the city limits. (Families could, however, pay to attend Dunwoody City Schools, much like they are able to do in City of Decatur Schools).
I also agree with you — it isn’t all about money. DeKalb spends more per pupil than both Fulton and Gwinnett counties. I do, however, think county schools excluded from city school districts would be harmed financially, but I think it is more important to note that students who — under our current system– are supposed to attend school with students from diverse backgrounds would be further excluded from students who are not within their own demographic.
Obviously our current process of creating districts and attendance zones segregates many students (eg. the Cross Keys cluster) based on income levels, education levels, and (often times) race. I don’t think we need any legislation that will exacerbate this already upsetting problem.
LikeLike
September 23, 2015 at 11:27 am
RFT, Thank you for the interesting debate.
Hightower Elementary is 2% white, is in the Dunwoody High School feeder pattern, but it is not in Dunwoody. To your point, if Dunwoody were to become a a school district, they would lose that diversity. However, Hightower is a Title I school which affords them many extra services. Currently, when those students leave Hightower, they lose all those extra services because they go to a non Title 1 middle school in Dunwoody. That is a huge burden placed on those students overnight.
Back to my original point, Dunwoody High School will still be relatively diverse even if every student goes to public school. You mentioned a concern for the lack of diversity at various schools like Cross Keys and McNair High School which is 98% black. I look forward to seeing your push for diversity there. Perhaps half the students at Cross Keys should go to McNair and half the students at McNair should go to Cross Keys.
If city school districts are a bad idea, then you should also be talking about getting rid of our current city school districts like Decatur.
How do you feel about getting rid of all the school districts in the state and having just one big diverse state school district? If that’s too big, then what is the right size?
Philosophically, why should some cities be allowed to have school districts and some not (legally we know how this came about)?
Dekalb is considered property wealthy by QBE standards and pays over $100 million annually to the state in equalization grants. With a city school district, that burden would shift to Dunwoody.
I’m glad to see you’ve re-evaluated your previous position stated in How Does Funding Impact Student Achievement. Since student achievement is the goal here and not the money, “Harmed Financially” is a scare tactic. The amount of money spent in the district per student has no bearing on academic achievement. How you spend the money you have is the key 😉
LikeLike